رویکرد روزنامه «مساوات» به بحران جامعه مشروطه: از استبداد تا آزادی و عدالت ‌

The necessity of reproducing the intellectual discourses of the Constitutional era to respond to the intellectual challenges of today's society demands greater attention to the media heritage and publications of this period. In this regard, the main objective of the present research is to re-examine, analyze, and explain the intellectual approach and proposed solutions of the 'Mosavat' newspaper to confront the complex crises of the Constitutional era. This study seeks to identify and clarify one of the key intellectual-political models of that era by exploring the newspaper's positions, how it responded to the concerns of its time, and the vision it offered for Iran's future. The central question of the research is what approach the managers of the 'Mosavat' newspaper adopted to deal with the multiple political, social, and economic crises of Iran's Constitutional society, and what solutions they offered for overcoming these crises. In other words, this research endeavors to clarify the intellectual system of ‘Mosavat’ newspaper in diagnosing the roots of the crisis and offering solutions for transition to a society based on liberty and justice. Relying on a descriptive-analytical research method, this study analyzes the content of the 'Mosavat' newspaper as its primary source. Data was collected through meticulous study of available issues of the newspaper, and their verification was carried out by comparing the newspaper's content with the historical events and developments of the period under study (the post-First Constitutional and Small Autocracy periods). Within this framework, an attempt has been made to explain the positions and views of the newspaper's managers not as isolated phenomena, but as a direct reaction to the exigencies of the time and the key actions of the political-social actors of that era. The research findings reveal that the managers of 'Mosavat', with a deep understanding of the critical conditions of their time, 
identified the primary causes of Iran's problems as a duality of "internal despotism" and "foreign colonialism," which had led to the society's humiliation, misery, chaos, and backwardness. In response to this diagnosis, they pursued a dual-pronged solution. On the political level: with a positive view of Western modern achievements, they accepted constitutionalism as a desirable model to replace despotism. They defined liberty as freedom from despotism and the political participation of the nation, emphasizing the necessity of the rule of law, parliamentary independence, and separation of powers. On the social and economic level: they considered the realization of "justice" and "equality" as a necessary condition and the true spirit of liberty for achieving societal progress and prosperity. With a social-democratic outlook, they supported the lower classes of society and stressed the need for equality before the law and the equitable distribution of wealth. The prominent and distinguishing feature of 'Mosavat's' approach was its effort to establish a link between new modern concepts (such as law, political liberty, and equality) and authentic Islamic teachings. Citing verses from the Quran, the conduct of the Prophet (PBUH) and Imams, and offering a novel interpretation of religious texts, they sought to present Western-derived concepts with an Islamic guise and legitimize them against their main opponents, the supporters of constitutionalism. Within this framework, despotism was rejected as an anti-Islamic phenomenon, constitutionalism was accepted as an achievement compatible with Islam, and liberty and justice were presented as heavenly values. Ultimately, it can be concluded that the 'Mosavat' newspaper represented a reformist, yet radical, discourse in the political landscape of the Constitutional era. By explaining
key concepts such as liberty, justice, and equality through the lens of modernity while simultaneously presenting a new interpretation of Islam, this newspaper sought to legitimize the project of constitutionalism and neutralize its main opponents. This approach was deeply influenced by the exigencies of the time and was a direct reaction to the intensification of political tensions, the intellectual alignments between constitutionalists and the numerous crises of that period. Nevertheless, 'Mosavat's' reform project remained incomplete due to the complexity and radicalization of socio-political conditions and the occurrence of events such as the Small Autocracy and the bombardment of the parliament. However, the analysis of this approach provides a profound understanding of one of the most significant intellectual endeavors of that era to synthesize tradition and modernity, the re-examination of which remains instructive for understanding Iran's contemporary intellectual challenges.